@ingowinkler1168
Another very interesting tool. Given the Nummer of tools you suggested on your channel, I wonder when you start talking about resonsible use of AI in academia.
@glenyoung1337
How does the tool compare to the others on the market (Elicit, Perplexity, Consensus, Afforai, etc.)? Would love a video comparing the products and highlighting the strengths/weaknesses of each. Which one is the best?
@brandenborn9510
Andy, your stuff is amazing and your enthusiasm for teaching is contagious. Thank you for helping people understand the opportunities provided by such AI tools. As a faculty member, I very much appreciate your regular comments that people ultimately also need to actually read the text to hold the knowledge for themselves. I'm a bit amazed and equally skeeved out seeing the generative capabilities, though again, thanks for being explicit about not using that as original work. What are your thoughts on the ever-moving gray line between such AI generated text and original text? I think once people have such detailed text it's hard to just rework it into their own voice.
@AnswerThisio
Entertaining and great overview of our tool, Andy! We're all about helping researchers save time without sacrificing quality. Glad to see AnswerThis fitting right into your workflow. We’ve built the tool entirely around what researchers need, and we're always open to feedback as we continue to roll out new updates. If anyone has questions or thoughts, don’t hesitate to let us know!
@immanuelg1
It looks a lot like SciSpace where you can ask a question in natural language and it will display 5-10 top papers and then you can display dozens more. And you can chat with the paper. You can upload papers as well. Etc. And of course SciSpace is available as a GPT in Chatgpt so it's integrated with all your other chats...
@Foodieme610
Thanks for sharing such a wonderful tool.....am going to use it for my project work...
@shawnershorts
Thanks Dr Andy, very efficient. Used it to strengthen a lit review for a paper that I have to revise and it even referenced a preprint that I have on the topic lol. Nice. Just have to validate the references because it doesn't reliably give DOIs on all in the reference list.
@stambeccojoe2
I've tried this tool while following your video, to test whether it could actually be of help in a literature review I will now have to perform. I went through the obtained output (ie, the review made by Answerthis). To be honest, I do not see in which parallel universe such a superficial and off-target product could be passed off as a scientific literature review in any way.
@OliveirosDiasJr
Hi Andy, great job! I am learning a lot with you. I realized that you research about photovoltaic systems/materials. A long time ago, 90's, I was studying photovoltaic systems, and one of my references was Dr. Martin Green, and his book Solar Cells, he was from Australia as you. So if you allow me, I can call you a "friend". Thank you a lot. And, if someday I go to Australia, I will search for you. 🙏
@rudicerny
👋perfect! I like your enthusiasm. Your vlogs are a very good source for orientation in this explisively growing area!
@rutger4131
I'm afraid that the amount of b.s. that's going to be published in the coming years is just as worrying as how worringly good this is. It's already happening but it will scale up. The REAL challenge in academia in the future will be finding papers that are actually of value.
@lifeprinciplespodcast
Andy, Salam. Thanks. You are amazing and making our lives so much easier. Thanks. Just a question. Is this now your favourite tool? Or you're still recimandung others?
@uxormenlac
Very useful tool, like a weapon of mass destruction; press the button and be done with it... I think that the only real value of this kind of tool is to show how a literature review should not be done. The purpose of the LR is to establish the foundation for the researcher's original work therefore it is mainly intended for the researcher to figure out what has been previously done in their chosen field of research. It should be a methodical process of searching, reading and writing to become acquainted with the matter and consolidate the knowledge through the process of writing.
@kieranhanrahan2883
Hi Andy, love your videos. I did a test on this in respect of a qualitative research heavy domain and the results were not good (that's me being very diplomatic).... it found just 4 cited articles over a specified 24 year period. Having studied the area, I know of around 40 papers, national plans, and other key documents that it should have found. I'll keep playing with it, but all these tools are only as good as the databases they are searching...
@danielgodwin1184
Could you please focus more on how to use this tools ethically. Because it could be confusing when we don’t know the extent to which we can go with the tools
@drfranke
Andy, great tool, but the free plan doesn't offer the papers. The good thing is there is a discount for educators with an EDU email.
@williamcattr267
Will the output pass an AI detection tool? What about plagiarism checks?
@vik6986
Great video as always. Please review Romo AI. Worth buying or not
@Seanchai_Tostach
The etymology of the word passion lies in the concept of suffering. So maybe it's not entirely far off the mark?
@Fatima_Saberi